Urgent SAP FICA Opening for CMMI Level -V

Auction Alliance's legal wrangle over search-and-seizure operations at its premises is expected to come before the Constitutional Court today. In the Western Cape High Court in June, the auction house won a constitutional challenge against laws ...

decision to review the case of U.S. v. Quality Stores Inc."in which the Sixth Circuit ruled that severance payments made to involuntarily laid off employees are not subject to FICA tax"should have great significance to all employers. If the High ...

McDermott Will & Emery, Chicago and Washington, DC A district court in Michigan recently rejected a motion to dismiss a participant's benefit claim, holding that an employer legally could be liable to a participant in a nonqualified deferred ...

The Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax: Otherwise known as the FICA Tax (or more colloquially as the Payroll Tax ). If you "earn income" through means other than a weekly paycheck for hourly wages, then this Payroll Tax, this quaint, ...

NEWS NOTES From the IRS The IRS announced the procedures employers should follow for filing refund claims for overpaid Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) and income taxes paid on employer-provided benefits for same-sex spouses that, ...

Explore: Employee Benefits FICA Taxes FUTA IRS Same-Sex Marriage US v Windsor Embed To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. Windsor changed the tax treatment of benefits ...

Were you at the max last year in terms of income subject to Social Security tax — $113,700? If so, don't gloat over the 3 percent raise you just got. It ain't tax-free money. The government just raised the max to $117,000. This was among the ...

For its article "Supreme Court to Consider Whether Severance Payments Subject to FICA, Bloomberg BNA Pension & Benefits Daily quoted Akin Gump Supreme Court and appellate practice co-head Pratik Shah on the U.S. Supreme Court decision to grant ...

In consolidated tax refund cases, a payroll service provider could not reduce the scope of FICA and FUTA employment taxes it paid by taking advantage of statutory caps for all employees for which it provided payroll services; rather, FICA and FUTA ...